<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joshua P. Larson &#187; Grammar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jplhomer.org/tag/grammar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jplhomer.org</link>
	<description>Journalist &#38; Web Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 01:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Media: Singular or Plural?</title>
		<link>http://jplhomer.org/journalism/media-singular-or-plural/</link>
		<comments>http://jplhomer.org/journalism/media-singular-or-plural/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Larson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jplhomer.org/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This might sound weird, but I've been thinking about something on a near-daily basis: the use of the word "media."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might sound weird, but I&#8217;ve been thinking about something on a near-daily basis: the use of the word &#8220;media.&#8221;</p>
<p>In a dictionary, you&#8217;ll find that &#8220;media&#8221; is a plural form of the noun &#8220;medium<em>.&#8221;</em> Standard use of the word &#8220;media&#8221; would require a matching plural verb.  As the <a title="Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary" href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/media%5B2%5D">Merriam-Webster online dictionary</a> states that the word is the plural form of &#8220;medium.&#8221;</p>
<p>But why do you hear people saying, &#8220;The <em>media</em> is ruining this country,&#8221; or, &#8220;The <em>media</em> is reporting a shooting&#8221;?  I&#8217;ve noticed this a number of times.  The Iowa State Daily recently published a special article called &#8220;The Top Ten News Stories that Changed Our Lives.&#8221;  They referred to the <em>media</em> as a singular term multiple times.  Author Dan Brown refers to <em>media</em> as a singular term in both <em>The DaVinci Code </em>and <em>Angels &amp; Demons</em>.  I always get the temptation to refer to the news media as a singular unit &#8211; the <em>media</em>.  So what is right?</p>
<p>Patricia T. O&#8217;Conner (who began at the Des Moines Register) and Stewart Kellerman met as editors at the New York Times and keep a blog about grammar.  They <a title="Grammar Blog" href="http://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2007/01/is-media-singular-or-plural.html">discuss</a> how &#8220;plurals with Latinate endings take a beating in English, and tend to become Anglicized over time.&#8221;  Apparently the words &#8220;data<em>&#8220;, &#8220;</em>agenda,&#8221; &#8220;opera,&#8221; and &#8220;insignia&#8221; are the same way!  O&#8217;Conner and Kellerman predict that the word will eventually evolve and become a singular term, like &#8220;data.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>My verdict: </strong>Stick to the plural form for academic, professional, and preferably journalistic writing.  Although the word will be fine to use as a singular term in speech, I think it&#8217;s best to play it safe for the time being and use the word as a plural term.  Until someone proves me wrong, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;ll be doing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jplhomer.org/journalism/media-singular-or-plural/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
